Religious Fundamentalism Scale (Revised).
RF / RRF
Religious fundamentalism: belief in one inerrant set of religious truths, an essential us-vs-them struggle against evil, and the need to follow fundamental practices of the past
- Provisionally grouped under
- Length and format
- 20 (original 1992); 12 (revised 2004). balanced 7- or 9-point agreement (pro- and con-trait items) (self-report questionnaire)
- Language versions
- Translated into many languages and faith contexts (e.g. across Christian, Muslim, Jewish samples; DE, ES, Persian, and others)
- Licence
- open with attribution
Licence classification is a research judgement by the catalogue’s authors, not legal advice, and it can be out of date. Confirm terms with the copyright holder or publisher before using an instrument, especially for commercial use.
- Reference
- Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (2004). A revised religious fundamentalism scale: The short and sweet of it. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14(1), 47-54.
More in Values, attitudes, ideology and morality
- PVQ-21 / HVS - Portrait Values Questionnaire - 21 item (ESS Human Values Scale)
21 portraits (Universalism = 3 items; the other 9 values = 2 items each). open with attribution.
- AMI - Ambivalence toward Men Inventory
20 (10 Hostility toward Men + 10 Benevolence toward Men). open with attribution.
- ASI - Ambivalent Sexism Inventory
22 (11 Hostile + 11 Benevolent). open with attribution.
- ATLG - Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men Scale
20 (10 ATL + 10 ATG); ATLG-S short form 10; ATLG-R revised wording. open with attribution.
- AWS - Attitudes Toward Women Scale
55 (original 1972); 25-item (1973); 15-item (1978) short form most used. open with attribution.
- BIDR / PDS - Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding
40 (20 SDE + 20 IM) in BIDR Version 6. mixed.
Use this instrument with your own participants
Research Seat is our white-label assessment platform for research teams and academics: we host and deliver an instrument under your branding, score it, and hand back the data. Whether we can deliver this particular one depends on its licence, which here is open with attribution. Tell us what you are measuring and we will say what is possible.