The Conformity Value: Meaning, Trade-offs, and Profile.
Conformity is one of the most misread values in the Schwartz model, because in everyday language "conformist" is often an insult. In the theory it means something specific and constructive: the willingness to hold back behavior that would disrupt, offend, or break the expectations the people around you rely on. It is the value of fitting your conduct to the social situation so that cooperation stays possible.
The conformity value
Conformity is one of the ten basic values in the Schwartz theory. Its motivational goal is the restraint of actions, inclinations, and impulses likely to upset or harm others or violate social expectations. It is not blind obedience or weakness of character; it is the deliberate self-discipline that keeps relationships smooth and group life functioning. Conformity sits on the Conservation side of the values circle, opposite the openness values of Self-Direction and Stimulation, and it pairs naturally with Tradition and Security. A high relative priority on conformity describes someone tuned to social harmony, not someone without a mind of their own.
This page explains what the conformity value actually means, what it looks like when it ranks high, the openness values it structurally conflicts with, and the neighboring values it reinforces. The framing is descriptive throughout. Prizing conformity is not more virtuous or more spineless than prizing independence; it is a different ordering of what you treat as worth protecting - here, the smoothness and predictability of shared life.
What the conformity value means
Each Schwartz value is defined by the goal it expresses, and the goal of conformity is restraint of norm-violating action. In practice that means politeness, self-discipline, honoring obligations to others, and avoiding behavior that would embarrass or upset people or breach what a group expects. The reference point is social: conformity is about not crossing lines that others would mind, rather than about deferring to authority for its own sake.
As with every value, the signal is relative priority, not raw intensity. Most people exercise some restraint, so an assessment reads conformity against your own average across all ten values - what you favor when smoothing a relationship and asserting yourself pull in opposite directions. A high relative standing means that when those collide, you lean toward preserving the harmony.
What prioritizing conformity looks like
People for whom conformity ranks high are attentive to how their actions land on others and reluctant to be the source of friction. This is a social sensitivity, and at its best it reads as reliability and consideration rather than timidity.
- Honoring commitments and meeting expectations even when it is inconvenient
- Holding back a blunt remark or a disruptive impulse to keep a relationship or meeting on track
- Reading the unwritten rules of a setting quickly and adjusting conduct to fit
- Feeling responsible for not embarrassing or burdening the people and groups they belong to
The trade-off: conformity versus openness to change
On the values circle, conformity sits opposite Self-Direction and Stimulation, the openness-to-change values. This is the structural tension at the heart of the conformity value: the same restraint that protects social harmony also pulls against the independent self-expression and boundary-pushing novelty those opposing values seek. Someone high in conformity may feel real discomfort when asked to challenge a norm, improvise against expectations, or assert a personal stance that would unsettle others.
The conflict is built into the model, not a defect in either profile. A conformity-led person and a self-direction-led person will diverge on the same call - whether to speak up against the room, whether to break with how things are usually done - and neither response is the right one in the abstract. Knowing where you sit on this axis is useful precisely because it predicts where the urge to keep the peace will compete with the urge to go your own way.
The values conformity pairs with
Adjacent values on the circle share a motivational basis and travel together easily. Conformity sits between Tradition and Security, and it reinforces both. With Tradition it shares respect for established ways: honoring customs and restraining disruptive behavior both uphold a settled social order. With Security it shares a concern for a stable, harmonious environment - smooth relations and personal safety are mutually supporting goals.
For this reason, conformity-led profiles often run alongside a commitment to customary practice (Tradition) and a preference for predictability (Security), and somewhat against the self-direction and stimulation values across the circle. None of these neighbors is required; they are simply the priorities that tend to accompany conformity because they serve compatible ends.
Also relevant: Schwartz values explained, Read the values test guide
Frequently asked questions
What does it mean to value conformity?
It means that maintaining social harmony - by restraining actions that would upset others or break shared expectations - ranks high among the goals you treat as worth pursuing. In the Schwartz model this is a relative priority: when keeping the peace and asserting yourself collide, you tend to lean toward harmony. It describes social attentiveness and self-discipline, not a lack of independent thought.
Is valuing conformity a bad thing?
No. In the Schwartz theory conformity means constructive self-restraint that keeps cooperation possible, not blind obedience or weakness. The theory is descriptive, not prescriptive - no value is better or worse than another. A high relative priority on conformity simply tells you that preserving social harmony tends to win when your values conflict.
What value does conformity conflict with?
Conformity sits opposite Self-Direction and Stimulation on the values circle. The same restraint that protects harmony pulls against the independent self-expression and novelty those openness values seek, so a strong pull toward fitting in and a strong pull toward asserting your own path are hard to satisfy at once. The conflict is structural, not a personal failing.
Which values go well with conformity?
Tradition and Security are its neighbors on the circle. Conformity shares with Tradition a respect for established ways, and shares with Security a concern for a stable, harmonious environment. These priorities tend to travel together because honoring customs, keeping the peace, and protecting stability serve compatible goals.
References
- Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
- Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1).
- Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2022). Personal values across cultures. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 517-546.
Built and led by a PhD psychometrician who designed international assessment frameworks for the OECD. About the team · How our tests are built and validated